home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!eo
- From: eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Emma Osman)
- Newsgroups: uk.misc
- Subject: Re: 29 Feb 2000?
- Message-ID: <C17qus.G48@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 16:52:04 GMT
- References: <6434@sersun1.essex.ac.uk>
- Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
- Reply-To: eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Emma Osman)
- Distribution: uk
- Organization: Laboratory for the Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh U
- Lines: 20
-
-
- Peter Allott (peter@serv2.essex.ac.uk) wrote:
- : Will there be a 29 Feb 2000?
- :
- : The cal program thinks so!
- :
- : As it also thinks 29 Feb 4000 will exist It's clearly wrong
- : some where.
- :
- : What is the correct rule? Do all countries agree????
-
- Am I going mad, or did we have this exact same discussion
- just a couple of months ago??
-
- Emma
- --
- *Emma Osman ********************** eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk * |----- |\ /| ***
- *I don't know much, but I know what I don't know**** |--- | \/ | ***
- *This .sig has been manufactured in line with EC**** |-------------- ***
- *standard 48#MA\SQGL53001.**********Please engage brain before flaming.*
-