home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / talk / rape / 3136 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-26  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.rape:3136 soc.men:23292
  2. Newsgroups: talk.rape,soc.men
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!ellis!thf2
  4. From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
  5. Subject: Re: Drunk Sex = Rape?
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan26.035856.4102@midway.uchicago.edu>
  7. Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
  8. Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
  9. Organization: University of Chicago
  10. References: <1993Jan24.193255.24302@nmsu.edu> <1993Jan24.205130.26002@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan26.023754.17077@nmsu.edu>
  11. Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:58:56 GMT
  12. Lines: 11
  13.  
  14. In article <1993Jan26.023754.17077@nmsu.edu> dsteinbe@nmsu.edu (David Steinberg) writes:
  15. >His grandparents might have something to do with it- the fact is that
  16. >he was referred to as something like "accused rapist".  The fact
  17. >remains that he was not found guilty.  When you bring up the trial in
  18. >a ridiculous context, you make it sound like he was found guilty.  
  19.  
  20. No.  That's what the words "convicted rapist" are for.
  21. -- 
  22. ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
  23. standard disclaimers          | void where prohibited
  24. the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
  25.