home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!kth.se!sunic!mcsun!sun4nl!hacktic!utopia!losers!dude
- From: dude@losers.hacktic.nl (Dude)
- Newsgroups: talk.rape
- Subject: NEWS: Feminists Integrate Men-Only Rape Talk
- Message-ID: <012093115347dude@losers.hacktic.nl>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 00:34:54 GMT
- References: <ATAYLOR.93Jan18153212@gauss.nmsu.edu>
- Lines: 24
- Organisation: losers inc.
-
- In article <ATAYLOR.93Jan18153212@gauss.nmsu.edu>, Nosy writes:
-
- AT> < Only if you read it out of context.
- AT>
- AT> Huh. Here is the context:
- AT>
- AT> >> The Campus NOW Board editorial states: "Based on our
- AT> >>experience with men-only groups -- fraternities, men's sports,
- AT> >>groups of men screaming at us from cars -- men in such groups
- AT> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- AT> >>frequently and openly display sexist attitudes and tend not
- AT> >>to object, but rather reward one another for sexist actions.
- AT> >>Because of this, Campus NOW stands against men-only groups."
- AT>
- AT> *IF* the Gainesville student paper quoted the NOW
- AT> spokesperson correctly, NOW is opposed to groups
- AT> of men in cars.
-
- Bullshit, if the police prohibits groups of people shooting bystanders from
- cars, according to your 'theory', the police is opposed to groups of men
- in cars too. So you *were* reading it out of context. Accept that, and quit
- hassling the same person over and over again with your sarcastic posts.
-
- Dude
-