home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!inmos!fulcrum!bham!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!citycs!lionel
- From: lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun)
- Subject: Re: Duane T. Gish, Ph. D.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.163344.723@city.cs>
- Sender: news@city.cs (News)
- Organization: City University, London
- References: <1993Jan25.165508.16938@city.cs> <1993Jan25.213222.25537@spectrum.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 16:33:44 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1993Jan25.213222.25537@spectrum.xerox.com> chris@eso.mc.xerox.com writes:
- >In article 16938@city.cs, lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun) writes:
- >>The fossil record for intermediates is sparse or non existent
- >>per se. There is a good reason for this.
- >
- >Well, Lionel, I'll bite. What is this reason?
-
- Take your pick:
- 1. Intermediates existed but strangely left no fossils.
- 2. Intermediates did not exist.
-
- I choose the simpler and more credible explanation.
-
- --
- ________ Lionel Tun, lionel@cs.city.ac.uk ________
- / /_ __/\ Computer Vision Group /\ \__ _\
- /___/_/_/\/ City University, London EC1V 0HB \ \___\_\_\
- \___\_\_\/ 071-477 8000 ext 3889 \/___/_/_/
-