home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!aurora!isaak
- From: isaak@aurora.com (Mark Isaak)
- Subject: Re: Who is Christian - a simple answer
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.152737.3490@aurora.com>
- Summary: Lewis's argument is worthless.
- Reply-To: isaak@aurora.com (Mark Isaak)
- Organization: The Aurora Group
- References: <1993Jan18.023442.51329@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> <1jpnkmINN272@dmsoproto.ida.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:27:37 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1jpnkmINN272@dmsoproto.ida.org> rlg@omni (Randy garrett) writes:
- >It seems to me that C.S. Lewis's Lord, Liar,
- >or Lunatic argument holds a lot of logical validity:
- [paraphrased: Jesus said he was divine. If he wasn't he was either
- a liar or a lunatic; either way, we shouldn't listen to his teachings.]
-
- The argument has no logical validity whatsoever. If someone whom
- you knew to be a pathological liar or a lunatic told you that most
- dogs have four legs, would that call into question the validity of
- the claim that dogs do have four legs?
-
- The authority of the person making a claim can be a useful first
- approximation of the validity of the claim, but ultimately every
- claim must stand or fall on its own.
-
- (And Lewis apparently knows nothing about insanity. "Lunatics" are
- usually quite rational about many subjects, and sometimes they're
- altogether more rational than so-called normal people.)
-
- And, to add relevance to talk.origins, I must point out that
- religion and science are orthogonal subjects. Christianity, not to
- mention religion as a whole, has no more to do with evolution than
- with scuba diving.
- --
- Mark Isaak "Every generation thinks it has the answers, and every
- isaak@aurora.com generation is humbled by nature." - Philip Lubin
-