home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!fedfil!news
- From: news@fedfil.UUCP (news)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Yet Another Saturn Myth Variant
- Message-ID: <244@fedfil.UUCP>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 14:34:46 GMT
- References: <234@fedfil.UUCP^<1993Jan21.134106.16927@linus.mitre.org> <1993Jan22.020227.26701@galois.mit.edu>
- Organization: HTE
- Lines: 41
-
- In article <1993Jan22.020227.26701@galois.mit.edu>, tycchow@riesz.mit.edu (Timothy Y. Chow) writes:
-
- ^In article <C17xIv.1yJ@athena.cs.uga.edu> keck@athena.cs.uga.edu (Paul) writes:
- ^<Unfortunately, Ted has never played with an electromagnet. Say one is hanging
- ^<from your ceiling, and you stick a hunk of metal to it. Pull the metal away
- ^<about an inch, let it go, and it will jump right back up, defeating gravity.
- ^<This might even work at a foot away. But, get it a couple of feet away, and
- ^<it will fall. Why? Gravity is much stronger than any known force _at a
- ^<distance_! For Ted's explanation to work, there would have to be an
- ^<incredibly large "electro-magnetic" force at work, more powerful than any
- ^<now-known force.
-
- ^Gravity and electrostatic attraction both obey a 1/r^2 law, so to say that
- ^"Gravity is much stronger than any known force _at a distance_" is
- ^outrageously misleading, if not downright false. What you really want to
- ^talk about is susceptibility/mass or charge/mass ratios of typical objects,
- ^because this is what decides whether gravitational or electromagnetic
- ^effects will dominate.
- ^
- ^The reason gravity dominates in astronomy is not because electromagnetic
- ^forces are "weaker" than gravity at large distances, but because most
- ^astronomical bodies have very little charge or magenetization compared to
- ^their mass.
- ^--
-
- I assume that this may not have been the case prior to the flood and the
- accompanying catastrophes. It is known for instance that Etrurean pottery
- often shows magnetism imparted from the earth's field which is far
- greater than the earth's field could impart now. Put the earth in the center
- of two electromagnetic stars, a small binary such as Saturn/Jupiter in
- which the partners had unequal electromagnetic fields, and the earth might
- take up residence at the point at which all forces balanced, which I'd
- assume would be closer to one of the two stars than to the other. The
- gravitational pull would certainly be uneven.
-
-
-
- --
- Ted Holden
- HTE
-
-