home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!yorkohm!minster!adh
- From: adh@minster.york.ac.uk
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Subject: Obnoxious pillocks observation #1
- Message-ID: <727985053.16959@minster.york.ac.uk>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 18:04:14 GMT
- Reply-To: adh@minster.york.ac.uk (adh)
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England
- Lines: 26
-
- there should, perhaps, be an apostrophe in the subject line.
- i don't think so, but you can judge for yourself.
-
- i note that at least one individual around here feels that
- people's bodies are for the delight of others, rather than
- in any sense to be used for the pleasure and convenience
- of the individual who inhabits them. this is clear from his
- repeated postings on the subject of breast reduction.
-
- i feel that he should practice what he preaches. when i was
- young, i was shown (as part of my school education) an animation
- of the mechanism by which a penis becomes erect. informative
- though this was, i think that a working model would be
- more effective. what i envisage is a human male, with the penis
- surgically modified with translucent and transparent components
- to permit easy observation and explanation. perhaps the circulatory
- system could be filled with some oxygenated, fluorescent marker
- solution to enhance the effect? i'm not a bio-modification expert.
- demonstrations could then be given by showing the updated
- person a pair of large prosthetic breasts, and observing the
- development of the inevitable ensuing priaprism.
-
- i assume we have a volunteer in the audience?
-
- wondering if hypocrisy is rife,
- adh
-