home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!sgigate!sgi!wdl1!bard
- From: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt)
- Subject: Re: When will We See the Changes in the Stats...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.224541.7647@wdl.loral.com>
- Sender: news@wdl.loral.com
- Reply-To: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com
- Organization: Abiogenesis 4 Less
- References: <1993Jan23.231931.29900@wetware.com> <14063@optilink.COM> <1k2qdfINN1m0@gap.caltech.edu> <81867@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1993Jan27.225215.26065@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 22:45:41 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
- # rpitts@cerl.gatech.edu (Richard Pitts) writes:
- # >As far as a societal consensus goes, I think most people believe that
- # >the unborn is a person.
- #
- # Actually, I think most people know that it's not a person.
-
- And *I* think most people would rather gargle bleach than even think
- about it.
-
-
- --
- +---------------------------+ I wasn't expecting it. When Danny Elfman
- | J H Woodyatt | sang the words, `goo goo ga choo,' Sunday
- | bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com | night, I cracked. Some horrors are too
- +---------------------------+ large to shade out.
-
-