home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: The issue is abortion, not choice
- Date: 28 Jan 1993 08:46:07 -0800
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 13
- Message-ID: <1k92kgINN653@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- References: <C1HKFw.38v@hpchase.rose.hp.com> <1k4ln8INN8k3@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <markp.728235773@joplin.wri.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <markp.728235773@joplin.wri.com> markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes:
- >In <1k4ln8INN8k3@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- >
- >So do I. But if the mother was free to choose (through non-procreative
- >sex, or abstinence) guaranteed non-pregnancy, then a subsequent violation
- >of the z/e/f's right to life is not an ethical option.
-
-
- So, you don't drive, huh?
-
- Adrienne Regard
-
-
-