home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!cherokee!steven
- From: steven@advtech.uswest.com ( Steve Novak)
- Subject: Re: Abortions should be rare
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.232716.29942@advtech.uswest.com>
- Sender: news@advtech.uswest.com (Radio Free Boulder)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: jaynes.advtech.uswest.com
- Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
- References: <1993Jan25.115252.2129@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <1993Jan25.195007.11399@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <93025.203043KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 23:27:16 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- > = (Kurt Ludwick) writes:
- >> = Mark Cochran writes:
- >>> = ?
-
- >>>According to both the Washington Post and the Washington Times,
- >>>Clinton said that America should be a place where abortions are legal
- >>>and safe, but rare.
-
- >>He certainly did. Don't you think that's a good goal to shoot for?
-
- >If you don't believe that abortion is wrong, then why try to have less
- >of them? Heck, -more- abortions would bring down the birth rate and help
- >with overpopulation, and it's safer than childbirth. Right?
-
- Sure, but RU486 and other proper use of birth control could accomplish
- the same MUCH easier. And proper sex ed in all schools would start us
- on the say.
-
- Right?
-
- >So why have less, if abortion is OK?
-
- Why not nip in the bud earlier, so to speak? Why not have kids properly
- educated? Why NOT provide free contraception to anyone who wants it?
-
-
- --
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Steve Novak | |"Wacker the K"|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- steven@advtech.USWest.Com
-