home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!wri!joplin.wri.com!markp
- From: markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs)
- Subject: Re: Kodak's Official Policy (formerly: Want to adopt)
- Message-ID: <markp.728236267@joplin.wri.com>
- Sender: news@wri.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: joplin.wri.com
- Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
- References: <1993Jan25.130932.10745@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan25.214821.29561@Happy-Man.com> <106596@netnews.upenn.edu> <1k46fiINN52p@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 15:51:07 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In <1k46fiINN52p@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
-
- >In article <106596@netnews.upenn.edu> rsk@gynko.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec) writes:
- >>In article <1993Jan25.214821.29561@Happy-Man.com> Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com writes:
-
- >>>1. Kodak should immediately fire any employee who criticizes it in
- >>>public, except that the reporting of a crime or suspected crime to
- >>>a law enforcement agency shall not constitute public criticism.
-
- >>Wanna join the Happy Fascists League of America? Sheesh, man, one
- >>does not give up one's civil rights by virtue of employment.
-
- >Gee, why not?
-
- >Heck, if one gives up one's right to control one's own body by virtue of
- >having sex, even using the most advanced contraceptive devices available
- >today,
-
- Non-genital/genital sex, and abstinence, are 100% effective.
-
- why couldn't we write a similar rule WRT employment?
-
- >*sarcasm off*
-
- >Adrienne Regard
-
- Mark Pundurs
-