home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 58163 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-28  |  1.2 KB  |  37 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!digex.com!intercon!udel!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!cos!cos!bob1
  3. From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
  4. Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
  5. Message-ID: <bob1.728156867@cos>
  6. Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
  7. References: <bob1.727989714@cos> <1993Jan25.202139.3229@ncsu.edu> <bob1.728069317@cos> <1993Jan26.191001.18208@ncsu.edu>
  8. Distribution: na
  9. Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:47:47 GMT
  10. Lines: 25
  11.  
  12. In <1993Jan26.191001.18208@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
  13.  
  14. >In article <bob1.728069317@cos> 
  15. >bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
  16. >>dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
  17. >>>bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
  18.  
  19. >>>> Funny thing is that nowhere in the ensuing articles or amendments
  20. >>>> did we tell them they could establish laws governing abortion.
  21.  
  22. >>> Or laws governing homicide, rape, and robbery.
  23.  
  24. >> Yep, general welfare. 
  25.  
  26. >That refers to Congressional authority, not state legislative
  27. >authority. 
  28.  
  29. >> Oh BTW, they did not say anywhere that the Constitution recinded
  30. >> the Declaration of Independance.
  31.  
  32. >The DOI has no legal bearing.  
  33.  
  34. Really? Wonder where they got those 'rights' that they said belonged
  35. to the people?
  36.  
  37.