home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 58070 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-27  |  1.5 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!psuvax1!psuvm!kel111
  2. Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 11:25:57 EST
  3. From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
  4. Message-ID: <93026.112557KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
  5. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  6. Subject: Re: Abortions should be rare
  7. References: <1993Jan25.115252.2129@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>
  8.  <1993Jan25.195007.11399@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
  9.  <93025.203043KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> <1993Jan26.063222.15317@netcom.com>
  10. Lines: 22
  11.  
  12. In article <1993Jan26.063222.15317@netcom.com>, ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer)
  13. says:
  14.  
  15. >Apparently because of your bigotry you don't realize that very few
  16. >people think abortion is a good idea.  It's just that a lot of us
  17. >think that forced pregnancy is a worse idea.
  18.  
  19. Bigotry, yeah right.  You're more bigoted against pro-lifers than I am against
  20. anybody.  There are a hell of a lot of people here who (as far as I can tell)
  21. feel that there's nothing wrong with abortion, since there's no "person"
  22. involved.  I would just like to understand why these people really want there
  23. to be fewer abortions, other than the inconvenience of making the trip to the
  24. Planned  Parenthood Clinic.
  25.  
  26. I understand (but disagree with) those who believe abortion is wrong, but
  27. shouldn't be restricted by law.
  28.  
  29. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  30.  Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
  31.  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
  32.  kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
  33. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  34.