home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!catnip!tanj
- From: tanj@catnip.berkeley.ca.us (Ren and Stimpy's Love Child)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: The pro-choice thought police in action
- Message-ID: <6014@catnip.berkeley.ca.us>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 22:44:18 GMT
- References: <1993Jan23.182126.8180@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan23.182821.8437@ncsu.edu> <CORWIN+.93Jan23214534@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> <1993Jan24.164519.12254@ncsu.edu> <bob1.727989549@cos>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Hecate's Sandbox
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <bob1.727989549@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
- >In <1993Jan24.164519.12254@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >>You're missing the point. The judge on the case *ordered* the
- >>lawyer not to use words such as ``murderers'' and ``killers''.
- >>Do you think the judge's order was appropriate?
-
- >Yes.
-
- I agree. The choice lawyers would, if they were as obnoxious as the pro
- lifers, be barred from calling the OR people "pro-force fetus fanatics" and
- "woman enslavers".
-
- --Teddi
- ----------------Another Catholic School Survivor (12 years!)------------------
-