home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!opusc!usceast!nyikos
- From: nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos)
- Subject: Re: Apology for insults
- Message-ID: <nyikos.727992914@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Sender: usenet@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: USC Department of Computer Science
- References: <1993Jan9.032032.14586@csus.edu> <1993Jan9.043801.553@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1993Jan10.021612.10126@crd.ge.com> <nyikos.726776120@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <9ha3=ab@rpi.edu> <nyikos.727394857@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <CORWIN+.93Jan19102546@MORPHEUS <nyikos.727627950@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <CORWIN+.93Jan22144246@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 20:15:14 GMT
- Lines: 58
-
- In <CORWIN+.93Jan22144246@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> corwin+@CMU.EDU (Scott Safier) writes:
-
- >In article <nyikos.727627950@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
-
- > In <CORWIN+.93Jan19102546@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> corwin+@CMU.EDU (Scott Safier) writes:
-
- > >In article <nyikos.727394857@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
-
- > > On the same basis on which Susan Garvin referred to Holtsinger as
-
- > > Doug "yer fat black ass" Holtsinger,
-
- > > I could call you "You are an idiot" rocker.
-
-
- > >Of course, Susan Garvin never called Reverend Holtsinger
- > >Doug "yer fat black ass" Holtsinger, so you would be
- > >basing your idiocy on nothing.
-
- > She altered an attribution line so it would read that way. Ron Bense
- > agreed with this when he claimed that irony is lost on me. Documentation
- > on request.
-
- >Check your own documentation. Susan did not say what you claimed.
-
- Are you saying a gremlin altered the documentation line for Susan?
-
- > [The irony was not lost on me. What was lost on me was the implicit claim
- > that people like you would know that Susan Garvin was being merely ironic,
- > rather than accusing Doug with having made a racial slur of an
- > Afro-American with those words.]
-
- >Since she didn't say it, this is irrelevant.
-
- The evidence is there in black and white. There is an altered attribution
- line. Since you have not requested documentation of me, I will not provide
- it. Maybe Susan will be willing to show it to you if you bow and scrape
- to her long enough.
-
- > >We still wonder if PHoney is capable of originality in his
- > >work, since he has yet to post an original flame.
-
- > You mean like your thread title, "Chaney needs a lobotomy"? I can tell
- > you right now, I will never be guilty of that kind of original flame.
-
- >Ya. Right.
-
- >Gee, PHoney, when are you going to get Chaney to apologize to African American
- >women? Everyone is waiting.
-
- Yeah, including Patrick Humphrey so he can tell everyone what an ass I am
- for making Chaney apologize. Will you also follow his example?
-
- You could make Chaney apologize easily enough by threatening to perform the
- lobotomy you say he needs. That should get results.
-
- Peter Ny.
-
-