home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!ray
- From: ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer)
- Subject: Re: Does James Keegan support Cochran's mandatory sterilization program?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.090739.1885@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom. San Jose, California
- References: <1993Jan20.021749.3583@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan20.114913.15012@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan20.142850.7982@ncsu.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 09:07:39 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes ...
- >judi@wam.umd.edu (Jay T Stein -- Conan the Grammarian) writes:
- >>dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >
- >>> "Personally, I think we need to develop some sort of 100% reversable
- >>> steralization procedure, and make it mandatory for both sexes to be
- >>> steralized to enter school."
- >>>
- >>> kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith Cochran)
- >>> <1993Jan17.210349.13155@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- >
- >> I still don't agree with it, but suddenly Mark's suggestion doesn't seem
- >> quite as severe, or as offensive.
- >
- >I don't know why it sounds better to you. I think both ideas
- >are equally disgusting.
-
- Why? Don't you support mandatory (forced) reversable pregnancy?
-
- --
- Ray Fischer "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth
- ray@netcom.com than lies." -- Friedrich Nietszsche
-