home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:57676 talk.religion.misc:27433 alt.atheism:26916
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!cookc
- From: cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker)
- Subject: Re: Christian Pro-Choicers
- Message-ID: <-lm3l3@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aix.rpi.edu
- References: <1993Jan15.224044.8617@noao.edu> <C19Fzr.7D8@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <yhl384a@rpi.edu> <1993Jan23.060902.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 08:11:38 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- kmagnacca@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
- >In article <yhl384a@rpi.edu>, cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
- >> cobb@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Mike Cobb) writes:
- >>
- >>>From the moment of conception the only thing that is added is food
- >>>and protection.
- >>
- >> Do me a favor. Go tell your mother that all she ever gave you in the
- >> womb was "food and protection".
- >>
- >> Warning - you may be somewhat surprised at her reaction.
-
- > She might be mildly offended that you would make such a statement
- >at all,
-
- I doubt that "mildly offended" would cover the reaction of most mothers.
-
- >but there's no denying that it's true.
-
- Of course there is. I deny it. See how easy that was?
-
- And tell us Karl, what you gave to the fetus the last time you were
- pregnant. You see, I know the subject a bit more intimately than you
- do.
-
- >Note that it says
- >"in the womb," and does not relate to what came afterward. Giving
- >food and protection involved vomiting and backaches on her part, but
- >they are secondary effects and not what is actually given to the fetus.
-
- Brush up on your biology.
-
- >Karl
-
- -rocker
-