home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!taco!eceyv.ncsu.edu!dsh
- From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: Re: Estimates of the incidence of illegal abortions
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.164351.24570@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: NCSU
- References: <1993Jan20.210343.23208@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> <1993Jan21.014921.9070@ncsu.edu> <C19Gyv.5tx.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:43:51 GMT
- Lines: 38
-
- In article <C19Gyv.5tx.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- >dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> +>>The incidence of illegal abortion in 1860 has NOTHING to do with the
- >> +>>ruling in Roe v Wade in 1973. Comparing medical practices across this
- >> +>>vast time is like comparing a slide rule with a supercomputer.
- >
- >> +>Actually, it has something to do with it. Unlike you, Blackmun researched
- >> +>the issue before stating his opinion. You might try learning something
- >> +>about the issue.
- >>
- >> <C0wM37.KE2.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- >> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
- >>
- >> And now we see Ms. Garvin furiously back-pedaling from that suggestion.
-
- > No, I've yet to backpedal from the suggestion that Justice
- > Blackmun did research into the abortion issue.
-
- That's not the suggestion I'm referring to, Garvin. You made
- the suggestion that the *incidence* of illegal abortion in 1860
- has "something to do with" the ruling in Roe v. Wade in 1973.
- Just what is the exact relationship, Garvin? Remember, we're
- not talking about the dangers of illegal abortion, as Kaflowitz
- has suggested, but rather the *incidence* of illegal abortion.
- Look at the subject line if you forget.
-
-
- >Susan
-
-
- "I'm only really good at judging colored semen contests, anyway."
-
- sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin)
-
- Doug Holtsinger
-
-