home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / soc / motss / 58729 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-28  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!usc!not-for-mail
  2. From: adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
  3. Newsgroups: soc.motss
  4. Subject: Re: Audrey (and Katharine)
  5. Date: 26 Jan 1993 16:29:03 -0800
  6. Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
  7. Lines: 17
  8. Message-ID: <1k4l0fINNg6b@mizar.usc.edu>
  9. References: <74199@cup.portal.com> <1jr4iqINNdhv@mizar.usc.edu> <1993Jan26.002707.9304@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <1993Jan26.002707.9304@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> 
  13. rosario@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Rosario Gennaro) writes:
  14. > In article <1jr4iqINNdhv@mizar.usc.edu> 
  15. > adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
  16. > >Oh.  I just never think "great actress" and "Katharine Hepburn"
  17. > >at the same time.  "Great movie star", yes, but not "great
  18. > >actress".
  19. >
  20. > Probably because you never watched "Suddenly last summer" 
  21.  
  22. Au contraire!  Katharine Hepburn is as convincing
  23. a Southern grande dame as I would be.  She's pretty
  24. good in Summertime, now that I think of it.  The
  25. rest of the time, though, it's all variations on
  26. the one character she *can* play convincingly: herself.  
  27.  
  28. Arne
  29.