home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23168 alt.abortion.inequity:6685 alt.feminism:7562
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
- From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: Privacy -- and responsibility
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 01:53:52 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 25
- Message-ID: <1jssrgINNkni@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <1jg739INNl6g@gap.caltech.edu> <C146FG.Eyw@cs.psu.edu> <1ji8gqINNg2i@gap.caltech.edu> <C1Boz1.C11@cs.psu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
-
- beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
-
- >peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>
- >>>Men have sex, flee the scene, come back for a few privileges,
- >>>then skip out. They have no obligations. Women who use no
- >>>birth control and then have abortions are bearing responsibilities;
- >>>men who use birth control which fails are "responsibility-free."
- >>
- >>Yes, that is a big part of my argument as pertains to the case where
- >>no child is born. If a child *is* born it gets more complicated
- >>that that because one must consider the rights of the child to be
- >>cared for and supported.
-
- >I am speechless in the face of such unabashed sexism. At least
- >it's better than hypocritical sexism. All IMO.
-
- Don, would you like to explain to me exactly what it is about
- my statement that you consider "unabashed sexism"?
- --
-
- -- Michal
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Impressive amounts of material can be accreted in this manner.
-