home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23062 alt.abortion.inequity:6633 alt.feminism:7481 alt.dads-rights:3452
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism,alt.dads-rights
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: Michal - Who should protect your rights?
- Message-ID: <C1826A.2np@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1jhk7hINN7rs@gap.caltech.edu> <1993Jan20.193459.3521@bnr.ca> <1jl0bpINNkpb@gap.caltech.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:56:34 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
-
- >I would dearly love to have such public records more easily available.
- >A national computerized database of birth and death records would be a
- >good start. I don't see that this would violate privacy since such
- >records are already public -- but it would greatly improve access
- >and simplify record-keeping. Comments anyone?
-
- A common misconception is that making "public" records more available
- does not decrease privacy. Many things that are public remain so
- by virtue of the difficulty of retrieval -- the price of a house,
- the age and number of people in your household, etc. Nobody objected
- (strongly) to their being public since the easy counterargument was,
- "It's too hard to get that info, anyway." You really have to re-evaluate
- all sorts of "public" records before you broadcast them.
-
- And imagine the resulting junk mail. I find more serious problems with
- the concept of making any "public" information easily accessible,
- but I suggest you look at comp.risks/alt.privacy if you're interested
- in discussing it.
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-