home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.bi
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!gtoal
- From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
- Subject: Re: Gripe: soc.motss
- Message-ID: <C1950p.LwE@demon.co.uk>
- Sender: news@demon.co.uk
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pizzabox.demon.co.uk
- Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
- References: <1993Jan21.203741.17574@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1993Jan22.000051.10916@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 10:55:36 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1993Jan22.000051.10916@midway.uchicago.edu> elle@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- :Several soc.motss regulars are bisexuals who avoid soc.bi, because what
- :you find sweet and friendly, we find ... cloying. I don't mind fluffy
- :nuzzle-lick-snuggle stuff _in person_, and I see a number of soc.bi
- :posters in person every week. Online, though, I find it most definitely
- :Not To My Taste.
-
- I'd just like to make a personal observation; that soc.bi has had fluffy
- times and it has had argumentative times, and I've noticed that when a
- fluffy period starts after long flames, we get a large batch of muffins
- coming out. I'm quite happy for soc.bi to stay a social group rather
- than a political one, if it means we end up welcoming more friends into
- the fold and offering us a chance to lend them support at the time they
- need it most.
-
- G
-