home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!max.u.washington.edu!games
- From: games@max.u.washington.edu
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: DC-1 eventual construction question...
- Date: 28 Jan 93 10:39:17 PST
- Organization:
- Lines: 56
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.103917.1@max.u.washington.edu>
- References: <1993Jan21.141726.1@max.u.washington.edu> <1993Jan26.024338.10181@iti.org> <ewright.728027076@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan27.020909.11819@iti.org> <1993Jan27.113743.1@max.u.washington.edu> <ewright.728179408@convex.convex.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: max.u.washington.edu
-
- In article <ewright.728179408@convex.convex.com>, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
- > In <1993Jan27.113743.1@max.u.washington.edu> games@max.u.washington.edu writes:
- >
- >>My question is more on the order of "how do we convince the manufacturers that
- >>they will be able to sell these things?" Including the possibility that
- >>somehow WE as a group step up, and place an order.
- >
- > One order is not going to convince Boeing to do anything. They already
- > know they could get one order. The problem is, one vehicle could fly
- > off the *entire* backlog of satellite launch orders, plus soon-to-be
- > orders such as Iridium, in short order. What Boeing wants is to see
- > is proof that there's a large enough market to keep the orders coming
- > in, and that's not satellites.
- >
- Well, lets not limit this to Boeing. I know less about the development cycle
- for MD, and the rest of the people mentioned in earlier posts that want to
- build SSTO's.
-
- The real question is again "what specifically will it take"... two separate
- companies making orders... 5 separate companies... 1 company ordering 10 ...
- 1 company ordering 20...
-
- Assuming that the airline operational characteristics can be met (or hell,
- even double that cost), and assuming that the tourism paper from that U.K.
- guy is right, can you make money and pay off one of these things flying
- say, 5 guys a week, at $50k per head, with a satellite launch for 1 or 2 mil
- every other flight? Assume that the satelite market goes away right after
- you fly off the backlog (enough to pay off the first one?) Thats 1/4 mil per
- flight, for operational revenues of 12.5 mil per year (2 weeks off for
- dedicated maintenance)
-
- Can you put 5 guys up for a week in the payload bay of a proposed SSTO? or
- is it more like 10?
-
- Yes, later, you can put up a hotel can, and fly only saturday to take new
- ones, and return old ones, and do something else during the week, but not at
- first... (Besides, at this point, you can make the can (like a tinker toy
- set) big enough to run two rotations, and then three, and then... so as the
- cost of the flight goes down, you get more economy in scale...) And then, the
- first few flights, would cost more, in order to take advantage of the scarcity
- of the product. You might even get John Denver for 5 mil for your FIRST
- customer, and then some others at 1 mil each for the first 10 or 15 flights)
- (And, yes, I realize that the developer will probably charge more for the
- first one, so you can scratch thinking about making gobs of extra money off
- these first flights.)
-
- Assume that production SSTO's will cost what an airliner does, $40 mil or so,
- right? After operational expenses, fuel, etc... The 12.5 mil/year leads
- to payoff of the craft in 5 or so years. How does an airline amoratize
- its craft. They have lasted 20 years, right? Can you make enough money to
- buy a second and a third, and a fourth...
-
- These figures are so rough it hurts my hands to type them. What are more
- reasonable numbers. Who puts them together? And again, what are the potential
- developers REALLY looking for in order to get into the SSTO production
- business?
-