home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!digex.com!digex.com!not-for-mail
- From: prb@access.digex.com (Pat)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Precursors to Fred (was Re: Sabatier Reactors.)
- Date: 27 Jan 1993 22:44:11 -0500
- Organization: UDSI
- Lines: 22
- Message-ID: <1k7kqbINNabc@digex.digex.com>
- References: <1993Jan26.222349.29804@iti.org> <1k6aj1INNgtf@mojo.eng.umd.edu> <1993Jan27.165812.6931@iti.org> <1k6ndgINNl2j@mojo.eng.umd.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com
-
- In article <1k6ndgINNl2j@mojo.eng.umd.edu> sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu writes:
- |In article <1993Jan27.165812.6931@iti.org>, aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes:
- |>In article <1k6aj1INNgtf@mojo.eng.umd.edu> sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu writes:
- |>
- |>>[Dennis tries to convince Allen that building hardware and flying it on
- |>>Spacelab is a good thing]
- |>
- |>No, Dennis it trying to convince me that space stations cannot be built
- |>without doing lots of Spacelab flights.
- |
- |So how do you suggest NASA tests hardware and flight procedures before Freedom
- |goes up?
- |
- |Thirty seconds on the vomit comet don't cut it.
- |
- |
-
-
- I imagine that MIR would be a good place to do this.
-
- pat
-
-