home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
- From: roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Lunar Rotation
- Message-ID: <C18ppu.C2H.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 05:22:52 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.C18ppu.C2H.1
- Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu
- Distribution: sci
- Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology formerly National Bureau of Standards
- Lines: 22
- Approved: bboard-news_gateway
- X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest
- Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU
-
-
- -From: lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall)
- -Subject: Re: Lunar Rotation (was: Earth's rotation rate...)
- -Date: 21 Jan 93 20:15:20 GMT
- -Organization: NetLabs, Inc.
-
- -In article <C16EL7.Cqw@brunel.ac.uk> mt90dac@brunel.ac.uk (Del Cotter) writes:
- -: BTW, I heard that the Moon is actually *bistable*. Aren't we lucky we
- -: got the pretty face?
-
- -If we get bored we could always turn the Moon the other way 'round...
-
- The center of mass of the moon is displaced from the geometric center by
- 2-3 km. That being the case, it seems unlikely that it's bistable.
-
- Incidentally, this displacement provides evidence that the moon's tidal lock
- was achieved while it was still molten. (It's thought that the chief feature
- of the asymmetry is a much thicker crust on the far side. This would also
- account for the greater incidence of mascons on the near side.)
-
- John Roberts
- roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
-