home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:22735 alt.atheism:26827
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!IASTATE.EDU!danwell
- From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
- Subject: Re: Eve Mitochondia?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.115328@IASTATE.EDU>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
- Organization: Iowa State University
- References: <1993Jan19.170009@IASTATE.EDU> <30608@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan21.234925.5246@trl.oz.au> <1993Jan22.144307.22509@nastar.uucp>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:53:28 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1993Jan22.144307.22509@nastar.uucp>, phardie@nastar.uucp (Pete
- Hardie) writes:
- > I think you miss the point of the Eve studies. Certainly they will point to
- > a female as the 'source' of all people, because they can only look at females
- > anyway. They are looking for the number of 'family trees' in mankind - are
- > we ALL descended from one family, or did H. sapiens develop independently
- > in several areas of the world? The Eve studies are an attempt to find if
- > all humans have a single common (hominid) ancestor.
-
- The studies assume there is a common ancestor and attempt to approximate
- her location in time and space. The time coordinate would resolve the
- hominid/nonhominid question (and everyone would be shocked if the
- answer was "nonhominid").
-
- The scandal is that the initial report was of sucess when in fact the
- software used to derive the descent tree sucked so bad that other people
- got diferenct results by rerunning it. This is what happens when biologists
- write software without getting help from _real_ programmers.
-
- Dan
- Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
-