In article <C1H02x.K38@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> relipper@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Lippert) writes:
[snip]
>Seriously now, I really do not understand psychic advocates. The real world is a wondrously interesting place! Weirdnesses like black holes, einstein-rosen wormholes, quasars, quantum wells, point particles, superconductors, etc, etc, etc are bizarre and interesting, and best of all, demonstrable!
>
I don't understand psychic advocates either, and by all means agree that the
real world is interesting. But I do wonder at your apparent conviction that
the above list is "demonstrable!"
Superconductors, yes, but the rest of the list? In what way would you
propose to demonstrate a black hole, or an "einstein-rosen wormhole" (a
paradox worthy of podolsky), for example? Demonstrations of the PK you
