home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:23538 sci.skeptic:22899 alt.paranormal:2847 alt.sci.physics.new-theories:2852 rec.arts.startrek.tech:7781
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!lindsay
- From: lindsay+@cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,rec.arts.startrek.tech
- Subject: Re: New Physics, Healing, Paranormal
- Message-ID: <C1HDLF.D4D.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 21:41:38 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.C1HDLF.D4D.2
- References: <C1GEpL.4H7@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
- Lines: 17
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gandalf.cs.cmu.edu
-
-
- sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
- >I have been told that I am a "super star" in some powerful
- >circles that have decided that traditional universities are "brain dead"
- >and that something new-age is needed.
-
- And you're humble, too, apparently.
-
- >How is the new physics different from the old physics?
-
- The main difference is that the old physics exists to explain
- experimental evidence. You, on the other hand, don't seem to make
- much mention of evidence.
-
- Are your theories falsifiable?
- --
- Don D.C.Lindsay Carnegie Mellon Computer Science
-