home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!jcf
- From: jcf@world.std.com (Joseph C Fineman)
- Subject: Re: Airplanes fly upside-down, how?
- Message-ID: <C1JroC.Ewq@world.std.com>
- Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
- References: <1993Jan27.184332.1844@kth.se>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:40:59 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- myrberger@e.kth.se () writes:
-
- >The normal explanation for how airplanes fly is (simplified perhaps):
-
- >The wing is formed so the air have a longer way to go on the top,
- >therefore the air moves faster and an upward force is a fact.
-
- My understanding is that this "explanation" is a canard, and the fact
- that planes can be flown upside down proves it. An asymmetrical wing
- with a _circulation-free_ flow around it still experiences no lift,
- because the effect of the greater velocity on the longer side is
- counteracted by the fact that the normal to the surface is not
- vertical, so you don't get the full component of the force.
-
- The law says: lift is proportional to circulation. If you can somehow
- get circulation started around _any_ airfoil -- even a circular
- cylinder -- it will experience lift (i.e. a force perpendicular to its
- direction of motion).
-
- Unfortunately I don't have a reference on this, but I read a thorough
- discussion of this pseudo-explanation some years ago. It is one of
- those cute pieces of nonsense that will never die -- like the belief
- that E=mc^2 has something special to do with nuclear fission.
- --
- Joe Fineman jcf@world.std.com
- 239 Clinton Road (617) 731-9190
- Brookline, MA 02146
-