home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:23506 alt.sci.physics.new-theories:2840 sci.skeptic:22880
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.skeptic
- Path: sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti
- From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
- Subject: re: White Paper - definition of life.
- Message-ID: <C1J1IK.56p@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us
- Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:15:55 GMT
- Lines: 49
-
-
- From: schultz@garnet.berkeley.edu (Richard Schultz)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-
- theories,sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal
- Subject: Re: New Physics,Healing & Paranormal 2 "White Paper"
- Date: 27 Jan 1993 16:43:14 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
- Lines: 17
- NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <C1H5D6.6Jr@well.sf.ca.us> sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
- wri
-
- tes:
-
- >Brian
- >Josephson, a Nobel Prize Laureate in physics at Cambridge University thinks
- >that complex living systems, which unlike inorganic matter are not in
- >thermal equilibrium. . .
-
- I don't know much from physics, so I really can't judge whether the
- "physics"
- Sarfatti presents is the babble it appears to be. I am, however, a chemist.
- It's possible, I guess, that Josephson and Sarfatti have a really strange
- definition of life (one that includes, say, the earth's atmosphere, which is
- an immediately obvious example of "inorganic matter" that isn't at thermal
- equilibrium). More likely, to my way of thinking, is that this obvious
- simple blunder says something else entirely about Sarfatti's competence as
- a physicist. Or rather, lack of competence.
-
- Richard Schultz
-
- No Richard. Henry Stapp in several of his writings on quantum mechanics and
- consciousness (Henry is at Lawrence Bereley Lab) has pointed out that
- standard QM is really formulated for closed systems not for open systems -
- although the recent work in continuous measurement of does the watched pot
- boil variety is beginning to correct that.
-
- The intent of my remark was not to give a necessary and sufficient
- definition of life in terms of physics but only to point to a
- necessary condition - no living system is in thermal equilibrium or
- even near it but is in the far-from-equilibrium "nonlinear" region
- in the sense of Prigogine - and that this feature may interact with
- the quantum mechanics in surprising ways that overcome the unitarity
- barrier and permit quantum connection communication between widely
- separated quantum level parts of living systems- providing nonlocal
- coordination needed for healthy functioning. I think that's the
- sort of thing Josephson has in mind in his Foundations of Physics paper
- on the subject.
-