home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweiner
- From: bweiner@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Benjamin Weiner)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: photon 'detectors' - how reliable?
- Message-ID: <Jan.26.14.02.51.1993.20166@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 19:02:51 GMT
- References: <wwadge.727584610@csr> <MERRITT.93Jan21103409@macro.bu.edu> <Jan.22.17.39.48.1993.8101@ruhets.rutgers.edu> <MERRITT.93Jan25112138@macro.bu.edu>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 22
-
- merritt@macro.bu.edu (Sean Merritt) writes:
-
- >You erased, as others who poited this out, where I specified detectors
- >that exploit the the photo-electric effect. I don't know enough
- >about Charged Coupled Devices, do they use the photo-electric effect?
-
- Whoops, sorry. I wasn't trying to correct you, just adding a little
- information on something else. Yes: CCDs consist of semiconductor
- layers; an incident photon is absorbed, creating loose charges, which
- is confined to its pixel by an ingenious layout of the n and p layers;
- further ingenuity allows you to read the pixels out in order at the end
- of your exposure.
-
- >Does anyone know a manufacturer of CCD's, I should like to get a
- >databook. Also what are the costs as compared to a photo-voltaic
- >cell?
-
- TI and Tek are the biggies, it seems to me. They are expensive, though,
- and it seems to me that CCDs are most useful in imaging or other highly
- position-sensitive devices (they usually come in sizes 256x256 to 800x800
- or so pixels) - although I may only think this because of astronomy.
- Also they need to be fairly cold, to reduce thermal noise, so the cooling
- system adds expense and bulk.
-