home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa2.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: How to write integrals (was Re: The confusion of tongues (was ...))
- Followup-To: sci.physics
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 09:15 PST
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 27
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <22JAN199309155941@csa2.lbl.gov>
- References: <1jd41cINNdh4@gap.caltech.edu> <1jlhucINNrtj@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> <COLUMBUS.93Jan21101415@strident.think.com> <1jn1jv$k1c@agate.berkeley.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.197
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <COLUMBUS.93Jan21101415@strident.think.com> columbus@strident.think.com (Michael Weiss) writes:
-
- >On the topic of mathematicians' vs. physicists' notation, does anyone know
- >why most mathematicians will write an integral as shown below on the left
- >(unless they omit the dummy variable x entirely), whereas physicists prefer
- >the form on the right?
- >
- > / /
- > | f(x) dx | dx f(x)
- > / /
- >
-
- I think that it's just a matter of convenience. Physicists often write
- long messy integrals with no simple solution. In these situations, it is
- nice to know what kind of integral you have, just by looking at the
- beginning of the expression. Is it a multivariable integral? What are
- the coordinates, i.e., does it say dxdydz or r^2drd(theta)d(phi)? If you
- separate the integral sign from the volume element by a long expression, it
- is harder to see at a glance what you have in front of you.
-
- -Scott
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "It is not a simple life to be a single cell,
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV although I have no right to say so, having
- been a single cell so long ago myself that I
- have no memory at all of that stage of my
- life." - Lewis Thomas
-