home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.philosophy.tech:5004 sci.philosophy.meta:3175 sci.skeptic:22953
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,sci.philosophy.meta,sci.skeptic
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!skule.ecf!pelton
- From: pelton@ecf.toronto.edu (PELTON MATTHEW ALAN)
- Subject: Re: Mysticism and Provability (Was: Re: MINDWALK)
- Message-ID: <C1Hsq9.CBB@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
- References: <1993Jan19.182403.3979@newstand.syr.edu> <1993Jan20.050642.4355@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> <1993Jan26.163049.23614@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:08:26 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan26.163049.23614@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan20.050642.4355@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
- >>If you try to tell me that there is something that is real, cannot be
- >>perceived, _and_ has no physical effects, direct or indirect, then logic would
- >>indeed tell us to forget it. But I agree with logic here.
- >
- > I know an example of what you want: other people's
- >consciousness. When you get right down to it, all we have is induction
- >to verify they exist. Another's consciousness can't be perceived
- >directly. As for indirect, that calls for drawing conclusions. We may
- >believe that sentience is a prerequisite for human-type behavior, but
- >who knows? Maybe a mindless automaton of sufficient complexity could act
- >the same.
- >
- > Even your _own_ consciousness isn't provable by others.
- >Sentience has all the characteristics of a mystical notion, _is_ a
- >mystical notion, but pure materialists always seem to overlook it.
- >
- > Kayembee
-
- So?
-
- --
- / )/ )/ ) / /
- / / / --/----/--
- / / / / \ / /
- / / / \_/\ / /
-