home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / sci / med / 24419 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-25  |  783 b   |  22 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.med
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spdcc!dyer
  3. From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
  4. Subject: Re: Voodoo varicocele
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan25.195959.9254@spdcc.com>
  6. Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
  7. References: <1993Jan24.235452.14511@iecc.cambridge.ma.us>
  8. Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:59:59 GMT
  9. Lines: 11
  10.  
  11. In article <1993Jan24.235452.14511@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes:
  12. >(FLAME FOLLOWS) If so, why is varicocele surgery medicallly respectable
  13. >but homeopathy isn't?  Same situation: lots of anectodal reports, no hard
  14. >facts.
  15.  
  16. Perhaps because varicocele surgery isn't recommended for conditions
  17. other than varicocele? :-)
  18.  
  19. -- 
  20. Steve Dyer
  21. dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
  22.