home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.econ:9888 soc.culture.usa:10152 soc.culture.japan:14346 soc.culture.british:19485 soc.culture.canada:10437
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!ukma!cs.widener.edu!dsinc!pitt.edu!wbdst
- From: wbdst+@pitt.edu (William B Dwinnell)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.canada
- Subject: Re: US as No. 1 (3 data books)
- Message-ID: <2560@blue.cis.pitt.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 19:14:29 GMT
- References: <1993Jan22.220321.8579@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> <1993Jan26.114023.28748@adobe.com> <1993Jan26.165916.13401@sunova.ssc.gov>
- Sender: news+@pitt.edu
- Followup-To: sci.econ
- Organization: University of Pittsburgh
- Lines: 10
-
-
- Pam: I must say that you make some very good points regarding life in
- the United States. Although the argument might be made that, as
- at least in some respects the United States is the best country, relative
- to other countries, it seems like little comfort, when I think of how good
- it could be in an absolute sense. Being the best, relative to others, is
- really a function of the quality of your neighbors. I guess what I'm trying
- to say is that while America may rank 1st on some lists, that doesn't
- mean there isn't plenty of room for improvement.
-
-