home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!chemabs!jac54
- From: jac54@cas.org ()
- Subject: Re: Zimmermann's responses to Sidelnikov's
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.115302.27951@cas.org>
- Sender: usenet@cas.org
- Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
- References: <1993Jan21.143916.22207@colnet.cmhnet.org> <1993Jan22.154035.20835@shearson.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:53:02 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan22.154035.20835@shearson.com> dmandl@shearson.com writes:
- >In article 22207@colnet.cmhnet.org, res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) writes:
- >
- >>Actually, among the oddities I find delightful (and scary) about fortran
- >>is the fact that
- >>
- >> DO 10 I=1,5
- >>
- >>and
- >>
- >> DO 10 I=1.5
- >>
- >>are both valid, but do entirely different things.
- >
- >If I remember correctly, it was an error exactly like this that
- >blew up a U.S. rocket (complete with astronauts) back in the '70s.
- >One of the programmers used a comma instead of a period, or vice
- >versa, and no one caught it. The story was related in the C.P.S.R.
- >paper that argued against the "Star Wars" boondoggle. The paper
- >even included the original line of code.
- >
- I think you remember incorrectly. This was one of the early
- Polaris tests (late 50's-early 60's). How many stories of
- U.S. astronauts being lost in flight can you remember. I can
- remember one, and that had to do with faulty plumbing.
-
- Alec Chambers
-