home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!uuwest!max
- From: max@west.darkside.com (Erik Max Francis)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: Accretion Question
- Message-ID: <84DwXB11w165w@west.darkside.com>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 20:15:18 GMT
- References: <C1BHB6.198@world.std.com>
- Organization: The Dark Side of the Moon +1 408 245 SPAM
- Lines: 29
-
- moroney@world.std.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
-
- > An exception may be our own moon, one theory was a Mars-sized thing hit the
- > proto-Earth and blasted a whole bunch of material into Earth orbit, and this
- > became the Moon (through a similar process). This brings up teh question
- > why there aren't more large satellites of the inner planets, the only others
- > are the two probably captured asteroids around Mars.
-
- I've heard of this proposal. Computer simulations (several that I hvae
- seen) also seem to back it up, which indicate that it's certainly
- possible, though that may not be the way it happened.
-
- I don't think that there's much of a likelihood that _all_ of the inner
- system planets would have been disrupted in this way. For one thing, not
- every trajectory between two large bodies will create a captured moon --
- very few, in fact.
-
- Second, I wouldn't think that such an event was terribly likely -- that
- is, a _big_ object falling into the inner solar system. (I think there
- was a proposal a while ago that Venus came from outsystem, disrupted
- planets, changed axial tilts, etc., and settled into orbit, which would
- explain its strange rotational period. I don't know how much credit this
- idea was given, though.)
-
-
- Erik Max Francis -)(- ..!apple!uuwest!max -)(- max@west.darkside.com __
- USMail: 1070 Oakmont Dr. #1; San Jose, CA 95117 ICBM: 37 20 N 121 53 W / \
- Like strategic games of interstellar conquest? . . . Ask about UNIVERSE! \__/
- -)(- Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt; all things that are, are lights. -)(-
-