home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweiner
- From: bweiner@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Benjamin Weiner)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: Modelling the expanding universe?
- Message-ID: <Jan.23.17.25.20.1993.18033@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 22:25:20 GMT
- References: <C13sH3.1xL@well.sf.ca.us> <1993Jan19.161523.25667@cs.ucf.edu> <C15vp9.6x5@well.sf.ca.us> <Jan.22.18.22.58.1993.8665@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 25
-
- One of my sentences trailed off into nothingness in my previous post,
- here's the correction:
-
- I wrote:
-
- >I was, rather, trying to say that Newtonian gravitational collapse
- >and a "contracting universe" were two sides of the same coin.
- >Consider two points separated by a small amount in the early universe ..
- > --------------
- > -------- --------
- > early *------ -----_____ galaxy forms
- > *------ -----
- > -------- --------
- > --------------
- > time ----->
-
- >The lines represent geodesics followed by the particles. I hope
- >this shows
-
- the similarity of the expansion (due to the Hubble flow) to the
- contraction, which we usually describe in terms of Newtonian gravity.
- One says the spacetime in between is expanding, when they're following
- geodesics which take them apart; so in some sense it is appropriate
- to say that the intervening spacetime is contracting as they come
- together. However, angular momentum and internal pressure do act
- to prevent the solar system/galaxy from contracting to a point.
-