home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.astro:14257 sci.physics:23232
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ethanb
- From: ethanb@ptolemy.astro.washington.edu (Ethan Bradford)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Expanding space, or not?
- Date: 21 Jan 93 12:54:04
- Organization: U. of Washington
- Lines: 21
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <ETHANB.93Jan21125404@ptolemy.astro.washington.edu>
- References: <1993Jan21.125853.1@stsci.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ptolemy.astro.washington.edu
- In-reply-to: zellner@stsci.edu's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:58:53 GMT
- TO: zellner@stsci.edu
-
- General relativity gives a geometric explanation to gravitational
- phenomena; thus, we say that an object deflected by a gravitational
- field is moving "straight" (on a gedesic) in a curved spacetime.
- Also, we say that space is expanding.
-
- However, for weak and not rapidly varying fields, a Newtonian
- description is also correct. For cosmology, this limit applies for
- distances which are small with respect to the Hubble distance (the
- distance light has traveled since the start of the universe), i.e. the
- vast majority of what we can see (and everything for which the simple
- Hubble law, v = H r, is well defined).
-
- Thus, you can understand Hubble expansion correctly as galaxies flying
- away from themselves because of their momentum, with the rate of
- separation slowing due to their mutual gravitational attraction.
-
- The same limit applies in the early universe, as long as you replace
- the gravitating mass density by the energy density plus three times
- the pressure.
-
- -- Ethan
-