home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: craigb@sdd.hp.com (Craig Bosworth)
- Newsgroups: sci.aeronautics
- Subject: Re: V/STOL fighters
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 10:37:52 -0800
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <1jpeu0INNbib@hpsdl136.sdd.hp.com>
- References: <alien.02mo@acheron.amigans.gen.nz> <1jmj6lINN9lm@bigboote.WPI.EDU> <1jogamINNiua@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdl136.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <1jogamINNiua@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> doi@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Daniel Kuan Li Oi) writes:
- > Wouldn't the four nozzles of a non-afterburning turbofan have a
- >much smaller IR signature than two nozzles of a twin engined
- >afterburning plane?
-
- This appears to make sense in theory, but is quite the opposite of what
- we have observed in practice.
-
- In Desert Storm, several Harriers were lost to shoulder fired IR-seeking
- SAMs which caused structural failures when they exploded near the middle
- of the airplane (source: USMC aviator friend who was working on the AV-8
- program at the time).
-
- In contrast, several F/A-18s were hit by the same types of missiles but
- suffered only minor damage to the exhaust nozzles. Some of these
- airplanes flew again the next day (source: AvWeek, CNN).
-
- So survivability is definitely an issue that needs to be resolved before
- anyone commits to V/STOL in a front line fighter/interceptor/interdiction
- aircraft.
- --
- Craig Bosworth (619) 592-8609
- Hewlett-Packard, San Diego Division
- craigb@sdd.hp.com
-