home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.pyrotechnics
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!scsing.switch.ch!news.univie.ac.at!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!wolit
- From: wolit@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (Jan Wolitzky)
- Subject: Re: Rocket Fuels (solid or liquid)
- Organization: AT&T
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:41:07 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.184107.26886@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>
- References: <C16MC7.5rM@knot.ccs.queensu.ca>
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <C16MC7.5rM@knot.ccs.queensu.ca>, dale@hecate.phy.queensu.ca (Dale Swanston) writes:
- > Along this thread of H2O2, what is considered the best, most accurate
- > reference for rocket fuels?
-
- I don't know about "the best, most accurate reference", but this
- one isn't bad:
-
- Technical Report RD-PR-91-17, December, 1991, 234 pages
-
- Introduction to Rocket Propulsion
-
- J. Michael Lyon, Propulsion Directorate
- Research, Development and Engineering Center
- U.S. Army Missile Command
- Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000
-
- Available from Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) as AD-A250424
-
-
- --
- Jan Wolitzky, AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ; 908 582-2998
- att!library!wolit or jan.wolitzky@att.com
- (Affiliation given for identification purposes only)
- Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
-