home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!adagio.panasonic.com!nntp-server.caltech.edu!allenk
- From: allenk@ugcs.caltech.edu (Allen Knutson)
- Newsgroups: rec.juggling
- Subject: Re: Robot juggling survey
- Date: 21 Jan 1993 13:33:22 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 26
- Message-ID: <1jm8n2INN3jm@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <C14GDz.1AJ.1@cs.cmu.edu> <1993Jan21.030657.11097@ncsu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: torment.ugcs.caltech.edu
-
- mohit@apollo.psrc.ncsu.edu (mohit bhatnagar) writes:
-
- >excellent survey!!
- >can any of these people who built juggling-machines juggle? I know
- >claude shannon was very fond of juggling (partly that's why I got
- >addicted to it!!). does it matter if person building the machine can not
- >perform the task herself? or is it just a matter of getting right kind
- >of sensors, control mechanism etc. without any human insight in the
- >process itself?
-
- I hear that Claude Shannon also has a tilted air-hockey table on which to
- juggle in effectively lower gravity. (Which seems a great way to learn,
- to me: in particular, it forces you to throw from the middle, rather than
- throwing and catching in the same motion.)
-
- I think Buhler (who worked with Koditschek) is Joe Buhler, of the siteswap
- mathematical paper, and has taught many famous mathematicians to juggle
- (such as John Horton Conway of Life fame).
-
- I got the impression from talking to Koditschek that he had very weird
- ideas about juggling (i.e. that an experienced juggler wouldn't have).
- I don't remember precisely what, now; one thing I do remember is that
- in the robotics applications they were after, it was much less important
- to be able to juggle many, than to be able to recover from really grievous
- error. And indeed, their machine could fix situations no human could.
- Allen K.
-