home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu
- From: callison@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: Glock 10mm and CHP
- Message-ID: <C1Iso8.JIM@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Date: 28 Jan 93 04:15:20 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
- Lines: 25
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
- In article <MAILQUEUE-101.930126081318.288@english.as.ua.edu> DHORTON@ENGLISH.AS.UA.EDU (David A. Horton) writes:
- #I also have the feeling the test was slanted in favor for the S&W.
- #After all, one of the requirements for pistol selection was ease of
- #take-down in the field and requiring no tools. Heck, what's easier
- #than a Glock?? Even in the dark??
-
- How 'bout a Beretta ;-)
-
- #And the CHP had stringent deadlines
- #for submitting pistols for evaluation. Made things kinda' hard for
- #Glock and Colt. And the 40 had only been around for a few months.
-
- If they decided to go with the .40, it should've been obvious who they
- wanted; look at the name of the round-- .40 Smith & Wesson.... ;-)
-
- James
-
- James P. Callison Microcomputer Coordinator OU Law Library
- Callison@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu /\ Callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
- constellation!biglaw!callison@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu
- DISCLAIMER: I'm not an engineer, but I play one at work...
- "God didn't make men and women equal. Colonel Colt did."
- --Maggie Zombro, "Reasonable Doubts"
-
-
-