home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!mimsy!smoke.brl.mil
- From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: the spirit of rec.guns
- Message-ID: <19585@smoke.brl.mil>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 04:00:47 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Lab, APG MD.
- Lines: 8
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- In article <9301210053.AA12733@scorpio.ic.cmc.ca> keith@scorpio.ic.cmc.ca (Keith de Solla) writes:
- -I've been thinking, can we start calling 'assault rifles' something
- -better, such as 'service rifles'. That is what they are, after all.
- -Yes, its fun to type 'Evil Assault Rifle {tm}', (I do it), but we
- -may not be helping our cause.
-
- How about "militia arms", which is pretty accurate.
-