home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: myers@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Myers)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:12:31 GMT
- Subject: Re: CD vs. LP again (was Re: Preamp and Amp)
- Message-ID: <7490282@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Path: sparky!uunet!UB.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpfcso!myers
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- References: <1993Jan19.221047.7313@bnr.ca>
- Lines: 17
-
- > Granted. However, thanks to all of us who are not willing to
- > settle for slop, digital has been getting better. In the next few years
-
- Rajiv, given that the CD format has been stable for 10 years, how is it
- that "digital" is getting better? I could see making a claim that the
- analog electronics built into a given line of CD players has improved, or
- that we've seen other improvements in factors outside the format itself
- (equalizations for CD rather than LP, for example) - this is in no way
- "digital" getting better, since all the "digital" portions have remained
- unchanged.
-
-
-
- Bob Myers | "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but
- myers@fc.hp.com | most of the time he will pick himself up and continue."
- | - Winston Churchill
-
-