home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!hsdndev!news.bbn.com!NewsWatcher!user
- From: shetline@bbn.com (Kerry Shetline)
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Subject: Re: CD vs. LP again
- Message-ID: <shetline-260193191758@128.89.19.80>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 00:26:41 GMT
- References: <1993Jan19.221047.7313@bnr.ca> <1190792@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com> <1993Jan26.191547.5316@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Followup-To: rec.audio
- Organization: BBN
- Lines: 22
- NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
-
- In article <1993Jan26.191547.5316@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>,
- tom@afthree.as.arizona.edu (Thomas J. Trebisky) wrote:
- ...
- > (Is this LP-advocacy serious -- have I just misinterpreted some kind of
- > net-joke?)
-
- I may argue with people about technical reasons that they give for
- preferring LP over CD, but not the preference itself. While I tend to favor
- CD, particular recordings may well be better on LP for example.
-
- There are plenty of other reasons as well. Rather than try to restate them
- all, I would recommend that you sit back and read rec.audio for a while. Go
- out an read some magazines. If you apply the critical thinking necessary to
- separate the wheat from the chaff you'll get a better picture of the
- various points of view. It will temper your own viewpoint.
-
- > Dragging
- > a rock thru congealed petroleum, yeah, that's the technology for me!
-
- At least you've got a sense of humor. This I like!
-
- -Kerry
-