>And in the very next sentence trounces analog with a bogus reason.
>> Chances are that most analog appeal comes from
>> euphonius distortions that could be simulated in digital if anyone wanted
>> to try.
Ahhh, yes. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Shetline's reason is not bogus. He refers to an entire body of
knowledge that you have neither acknowledged nor refuted.
As seems usual, you are content to misstate your opinion as fact
and engage in ad-hominem attacks on those who have studied the
issues.
Kurt, go away. How do you propose he "trounces" analog? He doesn't.
He says the distortions ARE euphonic, which is a reccomendation,
I would think, rather than a trouncing.
--
Copyright alice!jj 1993, all rights reserved, except transmission by USENET and like facilities granted. Said permission is granted only for complete copies that include this notice. Use on pay-for-read services specifically disallowed.
---------
Member HASA - Athiest Scum Division
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" - AuH2O for President