home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!dgbt!ted
- From: ted@dgbt.doc.ca (Ted Grusec)
- Subject: Re: DAT, DCC and MD
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.010306.4398@dgbt.doc.ca>
- Organization: The Communications Research Centre
- References: <C15ozr.C3F@news2.cis.umn.edu> <GLAS.93Jan21081603@muresh.et.tudelft.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 01:03:06 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <GLAS.93Jan21081603@muresh.et.tudelft.nl> glas@donau.et.tudelft.nl writes:
- >
-
- >PASC is based on two phenomena of the human ear:
- >* One can only hear sound above a certain level, called the absolute hearing threshold.
- >* Loud sounds hide, or mask, softer sounds in their vicinity. They dynamially adapt the
- > hearing threshold. This applies to the frequency domain (spectral masking) as well as to
- > the tiem domain (temporal masking).
- >So you have to be a GOD to hear the differences between CD and DCC.
-
- Well Jack, I have run experiments on at least 25 or 30 people who must
- be Gods. Under tightly controlled, double blind conditions, they can
- tell the difference on certain audio materials with complete
- reliability. No lossy compression scheme is "perfect" - there will
- always be listeners who find non-transparency under critical
- materials. This does not mean that this kind of compression is not of
- very high quality, nor that it won't suffice for "average" listeners
- under non-critical conditions. I can send you published reports from
- my lab if you wish.>
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ted Grusec - Communications Research Centre, Ottawa, Ont., Canada
- Internet: ted.grusec@crc.doc.ca - (613) 998 2762 - Fax (613) 993 8657
-