home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!fmsrl7!lynx.unm.edu!umn.edu!student.tc.umn.edu!ritc0003
- From: ritc0003@student.tc.umn.edu (Kent Ritchie)
- Subject: Re: DAT, DCC and MD
- Message-ID: <C17MzG.5u5@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: student.tc.umn.edu
- Organization: University of Minnesota
- References: <C15ozr.C3F@news2.cis.umn.edu> <GLAS.93Jan21081603@muresh.et.tudelft.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:28:26 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- Another question about DCC...
-
- Some say that MD (or DAT for that matter) requires a additonal "spot" in
- your setup. They argue that DCC doesn't since it replaces the tape deck
- you (presumably) already have. My question is...
-
- WHAT THE HELL IS EVERYONE GOING TO DO WITH THEIR OLD TAPE DECKS???!!!
-
- I know if *I* had a decent analog deck (I don't) I wouldn't throw it out
- or stop using it. And if everyone is supposedly buying DCC at the same
- time as I am my quality analog deck would be worth nothing on the used
- market.
-
- Let's all pray that MD and DCC fail miserably. Sony and Phillips need
- a wake up call.
-
-
- --
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
- ^Kent C. Ritchie "The power of equality ritc0003@student.tc.umn.edu^
- ^Physics 136 is not yet what it ought kritchie@mvax.spa.umn.edu^
- ^626-0235 to be" -Chili Peppers Fido: Kent.Ritchie 1:282/31^
- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-