home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.taxes
- Path: sparky!uunet!orca!wumbus!quist
- From: quist@wumbus.sim.es.com (Douglas Quist)
- Subject: Re: Question of 1099-G, Icome tax overpayment
- Message-ID: <1993Jan29.003747.25252@dsd.es.com>
- Keywords: overpayment, 1099-G
- Sender: quist@wumbus (Douglas Quist)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.200.20
- Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT
- References: <1993Jan21.135752.21684@osf.org> <1993Jan21.182451.14324@cbnews.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 93 00:37:47 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1993Jan21.182451.14324@cbnews.cb.att.com>, ask@cbnews.cb.att.com (Arthur S. Kamlet) writes:
- |> In article <1993Jan21.135752.21684@osf.org> wwang@osf.org (Weidong Wang) writes:
- |> >It says that this information is also being furnished to IRS. Does it mean that
- |> >since I did an itemlized deduction for 1991, and since I deducted extra state
- |> >tax, now I have to repay the tax for this extra amount? 1991 is the first time
- |> >I did an itemlized deduction.
- |>
- |> If you deducted at least $131.16 then, yes, you have to declare the
- |> $131.16 as income (if you paid less than $131, declare that amount)
- |>
-
- THIS IS WRONG!!! There is a worksheet in the 1040 instructions that shows you how
- to calculate how much, if any, of the refund is includable in income for 1992. In
- most all cases, all of it is taxed, but you should work the worksheet just to be
- sure. No need to pay more taxes than necessary!
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Douglas B. Quist -- speaking only for myself, of course.
- quist@dsd.es.com or decwrl!esunix!quist or utah-cs!esunix!quist
-
- Funny how your feet in dreams never touch the earth - HEART
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-